Flights and Times of an Air Transport Graduate
Tuesday, 9 May 2017
2 Days Short of a Week (in Barcelona)
Monday, 16 January 2017
34 Hours in Zurich
The Towers of St. Peter Kirche and Fraumünster Kirche |
As I was passing the Rathaus it began to snow, which whilst making this beautiful city look even more picturesque, did seriously reduce visibility out over the lake. After trying to determine what I could see and warming up for a while with a coffee, I set off back towards the Hauptbahnhof with the intention of visiting the Swiss National Museum aswell as the Grossmünster.
Zurich Rathaus (Town Hall) |
A Model of the Grossmünster |
Lindenhof |
St. Peter Kirche |
Air Chine B747 |
USAF C-32 |
Thai Airways B777 |
Ethiopian B737 |
Variety of Traffic 4*
ZRH Overall Score 3*
Sunday, 12 July 2015
Underground...Overground....(Wombling Free)
Monday, 11 May 2015
"It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried"
"It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried" Winston Churchill
Since Thursday, there has been a lot of discussion of politics and on the whole, I have kept out of it. I have decided to do this one post as a vent and share the link. If people want to read it then great, if not then they either won't have got this far or you can choose to leave now. I am going to TRY and keep my personal opinions out of this as much as possible and the majority of this post will be facts and the dispelling of myths. I will however tell you how I voted. I obviously don't have to but I feel to try and make this post as open as possible I should. I am expecting for this post to have and cause debate, however I would appreciate it if we can keep said debate good natured.
In both the General Election and the Broxbourne local elections I voted Conservative. In the general it was essentially because I felt that David Cameron would be a better leader than Ed Miliband, and I was concerned about a potential coalition with the SNP. In the local elections it was simply this....No other party bothered to tell me that they exist or that they had a candidate.
Right that's my personal bit over.
Since the results became clear (and for a long time before) there has been a debate over the voting system in this country. It is obvious that First Past the Post only really works in a 2 Party system, and that one of the many proportional methods would be better. The BBC has an article about the different methods here. The article is from just after the 2010 election but it does show how each of the different systems work.
On the topic of proportional representation, I've seen a lot of 'if we'd have had PR the result would have been different'. Firstly it's worth pointing out that the same voting public (well about 2/3rds) that voted in this election voted against a form of proportional representation in 2011 by more that a 2:1 ratio.
My main point is this though. ..Yes, the result would have been different. What I'll let you decide is whether 'different' would have been 'better' based on the below. A word of warning, I don't know the source of the below graphic apart from it was on a friend's Facebook and it's on imgur, so I'm taking it with a pinch of salt.
This shows that the Conservatives wouldn't have a majority but would still be the largest party. By being the largest party and also being the incumbent, David Cameron would have the right to try and form a coalition first, according to cabinet office rules
The first party David Cameron would probably look at going into coalition with in this instance would be UKIP as they are also a conservative (little c) party. From my calculations this would give a total of 324 seats (242 CON + 82 UKIP). Although this wouldn't reach the theoretical majority of 326, it would reach the working majority of 324 (assuming 4 SF seats). If you add 4 DUP MPs to the figure it would create a coalition with 328 seats and a very slim majority of 2 seats.
If Ed Miliband had attempted to form a coalition based on these n0umbers then he'd probably start with the Lib Dems. This would give a total of 249 (198 LAB + 51 LIB). Next would be the SNP (despite what he promised during the election) and Greens bringing the total number of MPs to 304. Even if you throw in Plaid, TUSC, Alliance and 'others' then a Labour led coalition would still only have 315, 9 short of a working majority. There are 7 seats missing from the graphic which I am assuming 4 SF and 3 UUP.
Therefore under this scenario (obviously other forms of PR may have has different results) we would have ended up with a Conservative led coalition supported by UKIP and the DUP.
The second thing that keeps cropping up is THIS photo and allegations that this was on Friday/Saturday. To clarify the photo was taken in 2004 prior to the Blair administration's reelection. To ensure a fair and balanced point, I must note that there has been a Champagne delivery to Downing Street over the past few days, but as The i points out "it’s Bollinger rather than Moet".
Another thing I keep seeing is "The Conservatives got a majority when 75% of the voting public didn't vote for them, what mandate do they have?". This is correct, however more of the population voted for them than anyone else, therefore they have more of a mandate than any other party. If we list the parties in order of percentage that DIDN'T vote for them we get this
Conservative - 74.99%
Labour - 79.38%
UKIP - 91.44%
Lib Dems - 94.67%
SNP - 96.79%
Green - 97.45%
The last election to have a party form a government after gaining MORE than 50% if the vote was in 1935 when the Conservative party won 53.5% of the vote. Even then turnout was only 71.1% so they got the vote of 11.76 million out of approximately 30.92 million registered voters. In other words 61.97% DIDN'T vote for them.
Unfortunately not everyone is, was or will ever be happy with whatever result a general election throws at us. We can't choose how other people vote, what we can choose is to respect everyone's right to vote, everyone's freedom to speech and everyone's right to a private life. So however you voted, remember that person who voted the other way is a person too, not an animal.
N.B. If you want to know where any of my numbers/stats came from then please just ask.
Saturday, 11 April 2015
Stand on the Right! Please!
So once again I'm blogging whilst travelling on a train. I don't know why it's my blogging place, prehaps because there's nothing else to do for 2 hours. Anyway, as you know I tend to blog about's what's on my mind and unfortunately what's been on my mind are inconsiderate commuters! There are only 5 very simple rules to follow, which are very unlikely to delay you and possibly even get you there sooner!
1) Let people off the train first! You'd think this was obvious, but clearly not. If you don't let people off the train there isn't any chance of you getting on it (especially during rush hour). Therefore standing six wide infront of the doors trying to get on first is not helpful!
2) Walk on the left/stand on the right! If everyone drove on which ever side of the road they fancied it would cause aboslute chaos! So what happens if you walk on the right when most people are walking on the left....aboslute chaos! This applies to walking around stations and on escaltors. Follow the rules and everyone moves around much quicker!
3) Move down the platform! If you stop as soon as you enter the platform then about 5 people will be able to get onto the next train. Okay moving down the platform may mean you're not right next to the exit at your station but you might actually get on the first train as opposed to having to wait for four to come and go!
4) Don't run for a train! Firstly for safety! There are way too many incidents of people running into closed doors etc. Secondly the next train (on the underground atleast) is probably within 90 seconds! Waiting for 90 seconds isn't going to delay you much and it might save your face (and dignity!)
5) Mind the doors! The 'beeps' are NOT a starting gun! Once again safety is an issue here, getting body parts trapped in doors can result in a trip to hospital (with 4 hours waits at A&E, it's quicker to wait for the next train). Also you forcing yourself through the doors delays everyone else on that train, and every train behind you.
Okay, rant over! I promise it's not hard to follow these and by doing so you might well get home sooner! Also remember you may well be stuck on the train delayed in a tunnel because someone at the station ahead has held the doors!
Tuesday, 3 February 2015
"Shift work dulls your brain"
Okay so if the quote above is correct, it explains a lot! I've been doing shift work since I turned 18 and late finishes since I was 16. As I am currently sitting on the lovely Greater Anglia train (please not high levels of sarcasm - but that's a different story) on my commute in to work, I thought that I'd give you my thoughts on shift work.
So it's 5.45 in the morning and i've already been up for nearly 2 hours (oh the joys that alarm clock brings!). I've got to say that on the whole I don't mind NOT doing 9-5, in fact there are quite a few benefits....
Firstly is that with shift times of 6-2, 2-10 and 10-6, I am never commuting during rush hour (actually we'll go with 'peak time' because at best I think rush hour lasts for 3 hours these days). This means I can always get a seat and (especially important when in uniform) I am less likely to get glares from unhappy commuters.
Secondly, 2/3rds of the time I am able to have a lie in! I have never been a morning person, so I've got to admit that the earlies are a bit horrible, however not having to be up until 11 when I'm on lates is bliss!
Finally is that my rest days are not necessarily weekends. Okay this can be a bit of a double edged sword, especially with us doing SK events some weekends, however it can be extremely beneficial. It allows me to sort things out like going to the bank or phoning the council. Simple tasks admittedly, but I'm sure that you'll agree, a pain to do when you work 9-5.
So there's my opinion on shifts and i'll write a post in a couple of days regarding what i've been up to (I know it's been ages...sorry!)
Oh and if anyone is interested the title quote comes from the following BBC article.
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/health-29879521
Saturday, 25 October 2014
From Planes to Trains
So today I am travelling up to Warwickshire for a Muster with the Sealed Knot. Beth drove up last night but due to work I am travelling by train. For the first time I am traveling on Chiltern Railways one of the UKs less well know services and I've got to say I'm impressed.
Chiltern's London terminus is the lovely Victorian station of Marylebone. This station (partly through previous neglect) is still very much it's original self with the modern updates of electronic departure screens etc. Compared to my usual rail surroundings of Euston (a horrible 60s building) Marylebone is quaint, quiet and a fairly nice place to be at 7.30 on a Saturday morning.
I am writing this whilst sitting on the train using the unlimited free wifi (usually a cost is involved in standard class) with my phone plugged in and charging. Another great plus is that the seats on this train are comparable to first class seats on other operators.
And the best point? This journey is costing me a grand total of £6! And i'm getting to see some of the lovely Chiltern countryside. A similar journey on Virgin Trains/London Midland would cost me 2-3 times as much if bought in advance and I'd get to see the joys of Watford, Milton Keynes and the M1.
However, despite the plus sides of the journey there have been a few negatives... Firstly is the fact the golden rule of public transport has been broken...Don't sit near people if you don't have to! Despite a fairly empty train, a couple has come and sat on the seats opposite my table seat and have proceeded to kick me (accidently I'm sure) frequently whilst I have had my leg room stolen!
Also once again the rules of the 'quiet' carriage have been broken. I'm sorry how hard is it not to talk on your phone, have a loud conversation or listen to loud music for an hour and a half.
However overall this journey is an improvement on my usual rail travel so I really shouldn't complain and I'm going to try and use Chiltern if I'm ever going up to Birmingham.